Deagon vs Fitzgibbon, QLD suburb comparison

Deagon for schools; Fitzgibbon for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DeagonFitzgibbon

Overall score

Deagon

58.7/100

Fitzgibbon

58.4/100

Crime rate

Deagon

29.0 / 1k

Fitzgibbon

24.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Deagon

85

Fitzgibbon

141

Population

Deagon

3,773

Fitzgibbon

6,296

Metric leadDeagon 3Fitzgibbon 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDeagonFitzgibbon
Overall score58.7/10058.4/100
Housing (desirability)47.6/10076.0/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k24.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools46
Parks & reserves68
Public transport stops2717
Walkability61.0/10033.5/100
Nearby amenities85141
Population3,7736,296
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Deagon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Fitzgibbon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Deagon tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Fitzgibbon stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Deagon generally means more mid-market housing value, while Fitzgibbon leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Fitzgibbon, while Deagon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons