Deagon vs Fitzgibbon, QLD Suburb Comparison

Deagon for families and investment; Fitzgibbon for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DeagonFitzgibbon

Overall score

Deagon

58.5/100

Fitzgibbon

54.9/100

Crime rate

Deagon

46.5 / 1k

Fitzgibbon

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Deagon

89

Fitzgibbon

145

Population

Deagon

3,773

Fitzgibbon

6,296

Metric leadDeagon 3Fitzgibbon 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDeagonFitzgibbon
Overall score58.5/10054.9/100
Housing (desirability)63.2/10074.0/100
Crime rate46.5 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools46
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves68
Public transport stops2717
Walkability61.0/10033.5/100
Nearby amenities89145
Green cover21.8%24.1%
Population3,7736,296
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Deagon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Fitzgibbon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Deagon tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability, while Fitzgibbon stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. Deagon generally means more mid-market housing value, while Fitzgibbon leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Deagon if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Fitzgibbon for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons