Boondall vs Deagon, QLD Suburb Comparison

Boondall for retirees and value; Deagon for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BoondallDeagon

Overall score

Boondall

55.7/100

Deagon

58.5/100

Crime rate

Boondall

59.3 / 1k

Deagon

46.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Boondall

231

Deagon

89

Population

Boondall

9,603

Deagon

3,773

Metric leadBoondall 6Deagon 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBoondallDeagon
Overall score55.7/10058.5/100
Housing (desirability)63.1/10063.2/100
Crime rate59.3 / 1k46.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves176
Public transport stops4827
Walkability67.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities23189
Green cover19.1%21.8%
Population9,6033,773
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Boondall reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Deagon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Boondall pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Deagon is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, plus schools and education options. On housing, Boondall sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Deagon.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Boondall, while Deagon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons