Deagon vs Shorncliffe, QLD suburb comparison

Shorncliffe for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DeagonShorncliffe

Overall score

Deagon

58.7/100

Shorncliffe

57.9/100

Crime rate

Deagon

29.0 / 1k

Shorncliffe

29.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Deagon

85

Shorncliffe

73

Population

Deagon

3,773

Shorncliffe

1,907

Metric leadDeagon 6Shorncliffe 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDeagonShorncliffe
Overall score58.7/10057.9/100
Housing (desirability)47.6/10085.1/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k29.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Parks & reserves62
Public transport stops2717
Walkability61.0/10033.5/100
Nearby amenities8573
Population3,7731,907
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Deagon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Shorncliffe is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Where Shorncliffe is shaped by the coast, Deagon offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Deagon tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Shorncliffe stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Deagon generally means more mid-market housing value, while Shorncliffe leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Shorncliffe, while Deagon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons