Overall score
Bridgeman Downs
48.9/100
Carseldine
58.8/100
Bridgeman Downs for families and schools; Carseldine for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bridgeman Downs
48.9/100
Carseldine
58.8/100
Crime rate
Bridgeman Downs
18.8 / 1k
Carseldine
59.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bridgeman Downs
115
Carseldine
181
Population
Bridgeman Downs
10,938
Carseldine
10,093
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bridgeman Downs | Carseldine |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.9/100 | 58.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.5/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.8 / 1k | 59.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 32 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 71.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 115 | 181 |
| Green cover | 8.0% | 14.7% |
| Population | 10,938 | 10,093 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Bridgeman Downs is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Carseldine is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Bridgeman Downs sits among greener hillside streets, while Carseldine keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bridgeman Downs tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Carseldine stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
Households prioritising schools may find Bridgeman Downs the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Carseldine.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.