Chisholm vs Monash, ACT suburb comparison

Chisholm for investment and value; Monash for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChisholmMonash

Overall score

Chisholm

62.1/100

Monash

52.5/100

Crime rate

Chisholm

21.4 / 1k

Monash

14.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chisholm

126

Monash

125

Population

Chisholm

5,268

Monash

5,644

Metric leadChisholm 4Monash 41 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChisholmMonash
Overall score62.1/10052.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k14.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Walkability84.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities126125
Planning activity24
Population5,2685,644
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Monash is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Chisholm is stronger for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities; Monash answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Chisholm generally means more mid-market housing value, while Monash leans toward more sought-after housing.

Chisholm suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Monash is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons