Chisholm vs Theodore, ACT suburb comparison

Chisholm for investment and value; Theodore for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChisholmTheodore

Overall score

Chisholm

62.1/100

Theodore

50.6/100

Crime rate

Chisholm

21.4 / 1k

Theodore

13.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chisholm

126

Theodore

37

Population

Chisholm

5,268

Theodore

3,798

Metric leadChisholm 6Theodore 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChisholmTheodore
Overall score62.1/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k13.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Walkability84.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities12637
Planning activity24
Population5,2683,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Chisholm reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Theodore is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.

Chisholm pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Theodore is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Chisholm sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Theodore.

Chisholm suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Theodore is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons