Banks vs Theodore, ACT suburb comparison

Banks for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanksTheodore

Overall score

Banks

55.2/100

Theodore

50.6/100

Crime rate

Banks

9.4 / 1k

Theodore

13.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banks

45

Theodore

37

Population

Banks

5,100

Theodore

3,798

Metric leadBanks 6Theodore 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanksTheodore
Overall score55.2/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.4 / 1k13.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Parks & reserves1
Walkability59.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities4537
Planning activity34
Population5,1003,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Banks is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Theodore is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.

Banks tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Theodore stands out for schools and education options and a calmer planning outlook. Banks generally means more mid-market housing value, while Theodore leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Banks, while Theodore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons