Banks vs Calwell, ACT suburb comparison

Banks for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanksCalwell

Overall score

Banks

55.2/100

Calwell

55.1/100

Crime rate

Banks

9.4 / 1k

Calwell

20.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banks

45

Calwell

87

Population

Banks

5,100

Calwell

5,730

Metric leadBanks 2Calwell 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanksCalwell
Overall score55.2/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.4 / 1k20.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Parks & reserves12
Walkability59.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities4587
Planning activity33
Population5,1005,730
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Banks reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Calwell is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Banks pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, whereas Calwell is the better pick for schools and education options and parks and reserves. Banks generally means more mid-market housing value, while Calwell leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Banks, while Calwell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons