Banks vs Calwell, ACT Suburb Comparison

Banks for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanksCalwell

Overall score

Banks

51.3/100

Calwell

47.6/100

Crime rate

Banks

9.4 / 1k

Calwell

20.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banks

48

Calwell

88

Population

Banks

5,100

Calwell

5,730

Metric leadBanks 4Calwell 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanksCalwell
Overall score51.3/10047.6/100
Housing (desirability)55.0/10057.6/100
Crime rate9.4 / 1k20.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves12
Walkability59.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities4888
Planning activity34
Green cover5.2%5.0%
Population5,1005,730
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Banks reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Calwell is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Banks pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Calwell is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability. Banks generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Calwell leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Banks, while Calwell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons