Overall score
Banks
51.3/100
Bonython
52.2/100
Banks for investment; Bonython for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Banks
51.3/100
Bonython
52.2/100
Crime rate
Banks
9.4 / 1k
Bonython
10.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Banks
48
Bonython
86
Population
Banks
5,100
Bonython
3,839
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Banks | Bonython |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.3/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.0/100 | 66.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.4 / 1k | 10.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 86 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 10 |
| Green cover | 5.2% | 20.0% |
| Population | 5,100 | 3,839 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Banks reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Bonython is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Banks tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and overall desirability, while Bonython stands out for schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Banks generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Bonython leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees, families, and investors are more likely to prefer Banks, while Bonython remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.