Banks vs Bonython, ACT suburb comparison

Banks for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BanksBonython

Overall score

Banks

55.2/100

Bonython

50.3/100

Crime rate

Banks

9.4 / 1k

Bonython

10.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Banks

45

Bonython

79

Population

Banks

5,100

Bonython

3,839

Metric leadBanks 5Bonython 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBanksBonython
Overall score55.2/10050.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.4 / 1k10.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Parks & reserves1
Walkability59.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities4579
Planning activity310
Population5,1003,839
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Banks reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Bonython is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Banks tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Bonython stands out for schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities. Banks generally means more mid-market housing value, while Bonython leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Banks, while Bonython remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons