Calwell vs Conder, ACT Suburb Comparison

Conder for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CalwellConder

Overall score

Calwell

47.6/100

Conder

55.6/100

Crime rate

Calwell

20.2 / 1k

Conder

30.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Calwell

88

Conder

111

Population

Calwell

5,730

Conder

5,108

Metric leadCalwell 4Conder 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCalwellConder
Overall score47.6/10055.6/100
Housing (desirability)57.6/10053.3/100
Crime rate20.2 / 1k30.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools64
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves2—
Walkability78.0/10096.0/100
Nearby amenities88111
Planning activity42
Green cover5.0%14.5%
Population5,7305,108
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Calwell reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Calwell pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a larger local community, whereas Conder is the better pick for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Calwell suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Conder is the stronger match for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons