Overall score
Calwell
47.6/100
Conder
55.6/100
Conder for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Calwell
47.6/100
Conder
55.6/100
Crime rate
Calwell
20.2 / 1k
Conder
30.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Calwell
88
Conder
111
Population
Calwell
5,730
Conder
5,108
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Calwell | Conder |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.6/100 | 55.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.6/100 | 53.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.2 / 1k | 30.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 78.0/100 | 96.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 88 | 111 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 2 |
| Green cover | 5.0% | 14.5% |
| Population | 5,730 | 5,108 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Calwell reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Calwell pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a larger local community, whereas Conder is the better pick for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.
Calwell suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Conder is the stronger match for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.