Overall score
Bonython
52.2/100
Conder
55.6/100
Bonython vs Conder, ACT Suburb Comparison
Bonython for families and investment; Conder for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BonythonConder
Crime rate
Bonython
10.6 / 1k
Conder
30.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bonython
86
Conder
111
Population
Bonython
3,839
Conder
5,108
Metric leadBonython 3Conder 53 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bonython | Conder |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.2/100 | 55.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.5/100 | 53.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.6 / 1k | 30.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 96.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 111 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 2 |
| Green cover | 20.0% | 14.5% |
| Population | 3,839 | 5,108 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Bonython is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Bonython is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Conder answers with walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.
Retirees may find Bonython the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Conder.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.