Bonython vs Conder, ACT suburb comparison

Bonython for retirees; Conder for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BonythonConder

Overall score

Bonython

50.3/100

Conder

64.2/100

Crime rate

Bonython

10.6 / 1k

Conder

30.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bonython

79

Conder

110

Population

Bonython

3,839

Conder

5,108

Metric leadBonython 1Conder 53 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBonythonConder
Overall score50.3/10064.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate10.6 / 1k30.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Walkability32.0/10096.0/100
Nearby amenities79110
Planning activity102
Population3,8395,108
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Bonython is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Bonython is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Conder answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees and families may find Bonython the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Conder.

Related comparisons