Conder vs Kambah, ACT suburb comparison

Kambah for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConderKambah

Overall score

Conder

64.2/100

Kambah

76.5/100

Crime rate

Conder

30.4 / 1k

Kambah

16.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Conder

110

Kambah

260

Population

Conder

5,108

Kambah

15,670

Metric leadConder 3Kambah 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConderKambah
Overall score64.2/10076.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate30.4 / 1k16.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools43
Parks & reserves5
Walkability96.0/10092.0/100
Nearby amenities110260
Planning activity216
Population5,10815,670
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Conder reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Kambah is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Conder is stronger for schools and education options and walkability; Kambah answers with a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kambah, while Conder remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons