Overall score
Conder
55.6/100
Kambah
57.2/100
Conder vs Kambah, ACT Suburb Comparison
Conder for retirees; Kambah for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConderKambah
Crime rate
Conder
30.4 / 1k
Kambah
16.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Conder
111
Kambah
290
Population
Conder
5,108
Kambah
15,670
Metric leadConder 5Kambah 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Conder | Kambah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.6/100 | 57.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.3/100 | 66.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.4 / 1k | 16.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 5 |
| Walkability | 96.0/100 | 92.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 111 | 290 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 22 |
| Green cover | 14.5% | 6.5% |
| Population | 5,108 | 15,670 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Conder reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Kambah is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Conder is stronger for schools and education options, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook; Kambah answers with a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kambah, while Conder remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.