Overall score
Conder
64.2/100
Richardson
46.4/100
Conder vs Richardson, ACT suburb comparison
Conder for retirees and value; Richardson for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConderRichardson
Crime rate
Conder
30.4 / 1k
Richardson
29.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Conder
110
Richardson
58
Population
Conder
5,108
Richardson
3,058
Metric leadConder 6Richardson 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesConder
- Best for investmentRichardson
- Best for best valueConder
- Best for best schoolsConder
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Conder | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.2/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.4 / 1k | 29.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 8 |
| Walkability | 96.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 110 | 58 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 3 |
| Population | 5,108 | 3,058 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Conder tends to lead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Richardson stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Conder generally means more sought-after housing, while Richardson leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Conder the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Richardson.