Overall score
Conder
55.6/100
Richardson
36.2/100
Conder vs Richardson, ACT Suburb Comparison
Conder for retirees and families; Richardson for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConderRichardson
Crime rate
Conder
30.4 / 1k
Richardson
29.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Conder
111
Richardson
59
Population
Conder
5,108
Richardson
3,058
Metric leadConder 7Richardson 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesConder
- Best for familiesConder
- Best for investmentRichardson
- Best for best valueConder
- Best for best schoolsRichardson
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Conder | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.6/100 | 36.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.3/100 | 60.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.4 / 1k | 29.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Walkability | 96.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 111 | 59 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 3 |
| Green cover | 14.5% | 5.5% |
| Population | 5,108 | 3,058 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Conder tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while Richardson stands out for a quieter safety profile, plus schools and education options. Conder generally means more sought-after housing, while Richardson leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Retirees, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Conder the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Richardson.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.