Overall score
Kambah
57.2/100
Torrens
58.1/100
Kambah for investment; Torrens for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kambah
57.2/100
Torrens
58.1/100
Crime rate
Kambah
16.5 / 1k
Torrens
9.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kambah
290
Torrens
45
Population
Kambah
15,670
Torrens
2,424
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kambah | Torrens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.2/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.0/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.5 / 1k | 9.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 290 | 45 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 3 |
| Green cover | 6.5% | 13.7% |
| Population | 15,670 | 2,424 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Kambah reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Torrens is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Kambah is stronger for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Torrens answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.
Kambah suits value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Torrens is the stronger match for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.