Phillip vs Torrens, ACT suburb comparison

Torrens for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PhillipTorrens

Overall score

Phillip

67.1/100

Torrens

57.2/100

Crime rate

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Torrens

9.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Phillip

913

Torrens

33

Population

Phillip

5,197

Torrens

2,424

Metric leadPhillip 5Torrens 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPhillipTorrens
Overall score67.1/10057.2/100
Housing (desirability)19.4/10076.0/100
Crime rate70.8 / 1k9.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools117
Parks & reserves3
Walkability100.0/10026.0/100
Nearby amenities91333
Planning activity103
Population5,1972,424
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Torrens is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Phillip sits closer to the city centre, whereas Torrens is in a middle-ring position.

Phillip tends to lead on schools and education options and walkability, while Torrens stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Torrens, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons