Phillip vs Torrens, ACT Suburb Comparison

Phillip for retirees and schools; Torrens for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PhillipTorrens

Overall score

Phillip

61.0/100

Torrens

58.1/100

Crime rate

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Torrens

9.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Phillip

933

Torrens

45

Population

Phillip

5,197

Torrens

2,424

Metric leadPhillip 5Torrens 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPhillipTorrens
Overall score61.0/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)56.0/10060.0/100
Crime rate70.8 / 1k9.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools117
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves3—
Walkability100.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities93345
Planning activity123
Green cover12.4%13.7%
Population5,1972,424
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Torrens is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Phillip sits closer to the city centre, whereas Torrens is in a middle-ring position.

Phillip tends to lead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Torrens stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Torrens, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons