Overall score
Mawson
67.8/100
Phillip
61.0/100
Mawson for families and investment; Phillip for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mawson
67.8/100
Phillip
61.0/100
Crime rate
Mawson
26.8 / 1k
Phillip
70.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mawson
223
Phillip
933
Population
Mawson
3,440
Phillip
5,197
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mawson | Phillip |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.8/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.6/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.8 / 1k | 70.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 11 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 3 |
| Walkability | 98.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 223 | 933 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 12 |
| Green cover | 10.4% | 12.4% |
| Population | 3,440 | 5,197 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Mawson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Mawson pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Phillip is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mawson, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.