Mawson vs Phillip, ACT Suburb Comparison

Mawson for families and investment; Phillip for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MawsonPhillip

Overall score

Mawson

67.8/100

Phillip

61.0/100

Crime rate

Mawson

26.8 / 1k

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mawson

223

Phillip

933

Population

Mawson

3,440

Phillip

5,197

Metric leadMawson 3Phillip 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMawsonPhillip
Overall score67.8/10061.0/100
Housing (desirability)54.6/10056.0/100
Crime rate26.8 / 1k70.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools711
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves—3
Walkability98.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities223933
Planning activity912
Green cover10.4%12.4%
Population3,4405,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Mawson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Mawson pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Phillip is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mawson, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons