Farrer vs Mawson, ACT suburb comparison

Farrer for retirees and families; Mawson for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FarrerMawson

Overall score

Farrer

62.0/100

Mawson

68.5/100

Crime rate

Farrer

3.2 / 1k

Mawson

26.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Farrer

51

Mawson

220

Population

Farrer

3,787

Mawson

3,440

Metric leadFarrer 3Mawson 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFarrerMawson
Overall score62.0/10068.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10030.2/100
Crime rate3.2 / 1k26.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools37
Parks & reserves1
Walkability57.0/10098.5/100
Nearby amenities51220
Planning activity417
Population3,7873,440
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Mawson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mawson is closer to the city centre.

Farrer pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Mawson is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability.

Farrer suits retirees and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mawson is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons