Farrer vs Mawson, ACT Suburb Comparison

Farrer for retirees and families; Mawson for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FarrerMawson

Overall score

Farrer

68.3/100

Mawson

67.8/100

Crime rate

Farrer

3.2 / 1k

Mawson

26.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Farrer

58

Mawson

223

Population

Farrer

3,787

Mawson

3,440

Metric leadFarrer 6Mawson 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFarrerMawson
Overall score68.3/10067.8/100
Housing (desirability)62.6/10054.6/100
Crime rate3.2 / 1k26.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools37
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves1—
Walkability57.0/10098.5/100
Nearby amenities58223
Planning activity110
Green cover19.3%10.4%
Population3,7873,440
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Mawson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mawson is closer to the city centre.

Farrer pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mawson is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Farrer suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mawson is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons