Farrer vs O'Malley, ACT Suburb Comparison

Farrer for retirees and investment; O'Malley for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FarrerO'Malley

Overall score

Farrer

68.3/100

O'Malley

52.3/100

Crime rate

Farrer

3.2 / 1k

O'Malley

5.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Farrer

58

O'Malley

28

Population

Farrer

3,787

O'Malley

928

Metric leadFarrer 8O'Malley 04 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFarrerO'Malley
Overall score68.3/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)62.6/10033.9/100
Crime rate3.2 / 1k5.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves11
Walkability57.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities5828
Planning activity12
Green cover19.3%10.0%
Population3,787928
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while O'Malley is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas O'Malley is closer to the city centre.

Farrer tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, while O'Malley stands out for an affluent, sought-after address and highly regarded local schools.

Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Farrer the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer O'Malley.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons