Farrer vs O'Malley, ACT suburb comparison

Farrer for retirees and families; O'Malley for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FarrerO'Malley

Overall score

Farrer

62.0/100

O'Malley

46.1/100

Crime rate

Farrer

3.2 / 1k

O'Malley

5.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Farrer

51

O'Malley

23

Population

Farrer

3,787

O'Malley

928

Metric leadFarrer 6O'Malley 13 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFarrerO'Malley
Overall score62.0/10046.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10021.8/100
Crime rate3.2 / 1k5.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Parks & reserves11
Walkability57.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities5123
Planning activity412
Population3,787928
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while O'Malley is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas O'Malley is closer to the city centre.

Farrer tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while O'Malley stands out for a calmer planning outlook.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Farrer the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer O'Malley.

Related comparisons