Overall score
Farrer
62.0/100
Phillip
67.1/100
Farrer vs Phillip, ACT suburb comparison
Farrer for retirees and families; Phillip for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FarrerPhillip
Crime rate
Farrer
3.2 / 1k
Phillip
70.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Farrer
51
Phillip
913
Population
Farrer
3,787
Phillip
5,197
Metric leadFarrer 2Phillip 71 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Phillip is closer to the city centre.
On the data, Farrer is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Phillip answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.
Farrer suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Phillip is the stronger match for investors.