Isaacs vs Phillip, ACT Suburb Comparison

Isaacs for families and investment; Phillip for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IsaacsPhillip

Overall score

Isaacs

54.9/100

Phillip

61.0/100

Crime rate

Isaacs

11.7 / 1k

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Isaacs

54

Phillip

933

Population

Isaacs

2,379

Phillip

5,197

Metric leadIsaacs 4Phillip 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIsaacsPhillip
Overall score54.9/10061.0/100
Housing (desirability)57.4/10056.0/100
Crime rate11.7 / 1k70.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools211
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves—3
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities54933
Planning activity112
Green cover42.2%12.4%
Population2,3795,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Isaacs is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Isaacs pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Phillip is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Isaacs if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Phillip for families, investors, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons