Isaacs vs Phillip, ACT suburb comparison

Isaacs for value; Phillip for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IsaacsPhillip

Overall score

Isaacs

43.8/100

Phillip

67.1/100

Crime rate

Isaacs

11.7 / 1k

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Isaacs

52

Phillip

913

Population

Isaacs

2,379

Phillip

5,197

Metric leadIsaacs 3Phillip 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIsaacsPhillip
Overall score43.8/10067.1/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/10019.4/100
Crime rate11.7 / 1k70.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools211
Parks & reserves3
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities52913
Planning activity110
Population2,3795,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Isaacs is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Isaacs pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Phillip is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Phillip, while Isaacs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons