Overall score
Phillip
61.0/100
Waramanga
59.0/100
Phillip vs Waramanga, ACT Suburb Comparison
Phillip for retirees; Waramanga for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
PhillipWaramanga
Crime rate
Phillip
70.8 / 1k
Waramanga
16.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Phillip
933
Waramanga
83
Population
Phillip
5,197
Waramanga
2,785
Metric leadPhillip 6Waramanga 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Phillip | Waramanga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.0/100 | 59.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.0/100 | 70.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 70.8 / 1k | 16.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 74.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 933 | 83 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 2 |
| Green cover | 12.4% | 13.5% |
| Population | 5,197 | 2,785 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Phillip reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Phillip sits closer to the city centre, whereas Waramanga is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Phillip is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability; Waramanga answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Waramanga, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.