Phillip vs Waramanga, ACT suburb comparison

Waramanga for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PhillipWaramanga

Overall score

Phillip

67.1/100

Waramanga

58.1/100

Crime rate

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Waramanga

16.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Phillip

913

Waramanga

77

Population

Phillip

5,197

Waramanga

2,785

Metric leadPhillip 6Waramanga 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPhillipWaramanga
Overall score67.1/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)19.4/10076.0/100
Crime rate70.8 / 1k16.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools115
Parks & reserves31
Walkability100.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities91377
Planning activity102
Population5,1972,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Phillip reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Phillip sits closer to the city centre, whereas Waramanga is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Phillip is stronger for schools and education options and parks and reserves; Waramanga answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Waramanga, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons