Chapman vs Waramanga, ACT suburb comparison

Chapman for retirees and families; Waramanga for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChapmanWaramanga

Overall score

Chapman

62.1/100

Waramanga

58.1/100

Crime rate

Chapman

12.5 / 1k

Waramanga

16.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chapman

62

Waramanga

77

Population

Chapman

2,867

Waramanga

2,785

Metric leadChapman 6Waramanga 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChapmanWaramanga
Overall score62.1/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate12.5 / 1k16.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Parks & reserves21
Walkability76.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities6277
Planning activity12
Population2,8672,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chapman reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Chapman tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Waramanga stands out for schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities.

Investors may find Chapman the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Waramanga.

Related comparisons