Chapman vs Waramanga, ACT Suburb Comparison

Waramanga for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChapmanWaramanga

Overall score

Chapman

59.3/100

Waramanga

59.0/100

Crime rate

Chapman

12.5 / 1k

Waramanga

16.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chapman

65

Waramanga

83

Population

Chapman

2,867

Waramanga

2,785

Metric leadChapman 5Waramanga 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChapmanWaramanga
Overall score59.3/10059.0/100
Housing (desirability)59.2/10070.8/100
Crime rate12.5 / 1k16.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves21
Walkability76.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities6583
Planning activity22
Green cover5.3%13.5%
Population2,8672,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chapman reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Chapman tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Waramanga stands out for schools and education options, plus nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees, families, and investors may find Chapman the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Waramanga.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons