Pearce vs Waramanga, ACT suburb comparison

Pearce for retirees and families; Waramanga for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PearceWaramanga

Overall score

Pearce

60.4/100

Waramanga

58.1/100

Crime rate

Pearce

15.0 / 1k

Waramanga

16.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pearce

84

Waramanga

77

Population

Pearce

2,687

Waramanga

2,785

Metric leadPearce 4Waramanga 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPearceWaramanga
Overall score60.4/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)42.4/10076.0/100
Crime rate15.0 / 1k16.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Parks & reserves11
Walkability59.5/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities8477
Planning activity32
Population2,6872,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Pearce is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Pearce sits closer to the city centre, whereas Waramanga is in a middle-ring position.

Pearce tends to lead on schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities, while Waramanga stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Households prioritising schools may find Pearce the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Waramanga.

Related comparisons