Pearce vs Waramanga, ACT Suburb Comparison

Waramanga for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PearceWaramanga

Overall score

Pearce

59.4/100

Waramanga

59.0/100

Crime rate

Pearce

15.0 / 1k

Waramanga

16.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pearce

89

Waramanga

83

Population

Pearce

2,687

Waramanga

2,785

Metric leadPearce 4Waramanga 53 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPearceWaramanga
Overall score59.4/10059.0/100
Housing (desirability)58.2/10070.8/100
Crime rate15.0 / 1k16.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves11
Walkability59.5/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities8983
Planning activity42
Green cover6.2%13.5%
Population2,6872,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Pearce is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Pearce sits closer to the city centre, whereas Waramanga is in a middle-ring position.

Pearce tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Waramanga stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Pearce the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Waramanga.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons