Garran vs Pearce, ACT Suburb Comparison

Garran for retirees; Pearce for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GarranPearce

Overall score

Garran

54.9/100

Pearce

59.4/100

Crime rate

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Pearce

15.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garran

231

Pearce

89

Population

Garran

3,706

Pearce

2,687

Metric leadGarran 4Pearce 53 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarranPearce
Overall score54.9/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)39.9/10058.2/100
Crime rate23.2 / 1k15.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools76
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves11
Walkability80.0/10059.5/100
Nearby amenities23189
Planning activity144
Green cover5.1%6.2%
Population3,7062,687
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Garran is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pearce is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Garran is stronger for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Pearce answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors may find Garran the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pearce.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons