Garran vs Pearce, ACT suburb comparison

Garran for investment; Pearce for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GarranPearce

Overall score

Garran

61.9/100

Pearce

60.4/100

Crime rate

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Pearce

15.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garran

231

Pearce

84

Population

Garran

3,706

Pearce

2,687

Metric leadGarran 5Pearce 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarranPearce
Overall score61.9/10060.4/100
Housing (desirability)41.2/10042.4/100
Crime rate23.2 / 1k15.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools76
Parks & reserves11
Walkability80.0/10059.5/100
Nearby amenities23184
Planning activity123
Population3,7062,687
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Garran is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pearce is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Garran is stronger for schools and education options and walkability; Pearce answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Investors may find Garran the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Pearce.

Related comparisons