Deakin vs Garran, ACT Suburb Comparison

Deakin for retirees and families; Garran for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DeakinGarran

Overall score

Deakin

67.7/100

Garran

54.9/100

Crime rate

Deakin

31.3 / 1k

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Deakin

309

Garran

231

Population

Deakin

3,124

Garran

3,706

Metric leadDeakin 7Garran 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDeakinGarran
Overall score67.7/10054.9/100
Housing (desirability)46.6/10039.9/100
Crime rate31.3 / 1k23.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves21
Walkability92.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities309231
Planning activity1114
Green cover9.3%5.1%
Population3,1243,706
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Deakin is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Garran is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Deakin pulls ahead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Garran is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Garran, while Deakin remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons