Garran vs Isaacs, ACT suburb comparison

Garran for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GarranIsaacs

Overall score

Garran

61.9/100

Isaacs

43.8/100

Crime rate

Garran

23.2 / 1k

Isaacs

11.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garran

231

Isaacs

52

Population

Garran

3,706

Isaacs

2,379

Metric leadGarran 5Isaacs 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarranIsaacs
Overall score61.9/10043.8/100
Housing (desirability)41.2/10048.8/100
Crime rate23.2 / 1k11.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools72
Parks & reserves1
Walkability80.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities23152
Planning activity121
Population3,7062,379
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Garran is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Isaacs is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Garran is stronger for schools and education options and walkability; Isaacs answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Garran, while Isaacs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons