Overall score
Farrer
68.3/100
Pearce
59.4/100
Farrer for retirees and families; Pearce for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Farrer
68.3/100
Pearce
59.4/100
Crime rate
Farrer
3.2 / 1k
Pearce
15.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Farrer
58
Pearce
89
Population
Farrer
3,787
Pearce
2,687
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Farrer | Pearce |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.3/100 | 59.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.6/100 | 58.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 3.2 / 1k | 15.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 59.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 58 | 89 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 4 |
| Green cover | 19.3% | 6.2% |
| Population | 3,787 | 2,687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pearce is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pearce is closer to the city centre.
On the data, Farrer is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability; Pearce answers with schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Farrer suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Pearce is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.