Farrer vs Pearce, ACT Suburb Comparison

Farrer for retirees and families; Pearce for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FarrerPearce

Overall score

Farrer

68.3/100

Pearce

59.4/100

Crime rate

Farrer

3.2 / 1k

Pearce

15.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Farrer

58

Pearce

89

Population

Farrer

3,787

Pearce

2,687

Metric leadFarrer 6Pearce 33 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFarrerPearce
Overall score68.3/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)62.6/10058.2/100
Crime rate3.2 / 1k15.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves11
Walkability57.0/10059.5/100
Nearby amenities5889
Planning activity14
Green cover19.3%6.2%
Population3,7872,687
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Farrer is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pearce is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Farrer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pearce is closer to the city centre.

On the data, Farrer is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability; Pearce answers with schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Farrer suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Pearce is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons