Rivett vs Waramanga, ACT suburb comparison

Rivett for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RivettWaramanga

Overall score

Rivett

63.4/100

Waramanga

58.1/100

Crime rate

Rivett

12.2 / 1k

Waramanga

16.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rivett

73

Waramanga

77

Population

Rivett

3,354

Waramanga

2,785

Metric leadRivett 3Waramanga 34 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRivettWaramanga
Overall score63.4/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate12.2 / 1k16.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Parks & reserves11
Walkability59.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities7377
Planning activity22
Population3,3542,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Rivett is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Waramanga is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Rivett tends to lead on a larger local community, while Waramanga stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.

Rivett suits investors more clearly, whereas Waramanga is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons