Richardson vs Theodore, ACT suburb comparison

Richardson for investment; Theodore for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RichardsonTheodore

Overall score

Richardson

46.4/100

Theodore

50.6/100

Crime rate

Richardson

29.0 / 1k

Theodore

13.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Richardson

58

Theodore

37

Population

Richardson

3,058

Theodore

3,798

Metric leadRichardson 4Theodore 41 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRichardsonTheodore
Overall score46.4/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate29.0 / 1k13.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools84
Walkability30.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities5837
Planning activity34
Population3,0583,798
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Theodore is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.

Richardson pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Theodore is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community. On housing, Richardson sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Theodore.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Richardson, while Theodore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons