Fadden vs Richardson, ACT Suburb Comparison

Fadden for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FaddenRichardson

Overall score

Fadden

61.6/100

Richardson

36.2/100

Crime rate

Fadden

8.0 / 1k

Richardson

29.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fadden

224

Richardson

59

Population

Fadden

3,006

Richardson

3,058

Metric leadFadden 5Richardson 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFaddenRichardson
Overall score61.6/10036.2/100
Housing (desirability)56.8/10060.4/100
Crime rate8.0 / 1k29.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools58
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves3—
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities22459
Planning activity33
Green cover35.8%5.5%
Population3,0063,058
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/105/10

Comparison summary

Fadden reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Fadden pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Richardson is the better pick for schools and education options, plus a larger local community. On housing, Fadden sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Richardson.

Retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Fadden the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Richardson.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons