Overall score
Fadden
60.2/100
Richardson
46.4/100
Fadden vs Richardson, ACT suburb comparison
Fadden for retirees and families; Richardson for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FaddenRichardson
Crime rate
Fadden
8.0 / 1k
Richardson
29.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fadden
223
Richardson
58
Population
Fadden
3,006
Richardson
3,058
Metric leadFadden 4Richardson 23 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFadden
- Best for familiesFadden
- Best for investmentRichardson
- Best for best valueFadden
- Best for best schoolsFadden
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fadden | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.2/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.0 / 1k | 29.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 223 | 58 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 3 |
| Population | 3,006 | 3,058 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Fadden reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Fadden pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Richardson is the better pick for schools and education options and a larger local community. On housing, Fadden sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Richardson.
Retirees and families may find Fadden the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Richardson.