Overall score
Fadden
61.6/100
Richardson
36.2/100
Fadden for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fadden
61.6/100
Richardson
36.2/100
Crime rate
Fadden
8.0 / 1k
Richardson
29.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fadden
224
Richardson
59
Population
Fadden
3,006
Richardson
3,058
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fadden | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 36.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.8/100 | 60.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.0 / 1k | 29.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 224 | 59 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 3 |
| Green cover | 35.8% | 5.5% |
| Population | 3,006 | 3,058 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Fadden reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Fadden pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Richardson is the better pick for schools and education options, plus a larger local community. On housing, Fadden sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Richardson.
Retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Fadden the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Richardson.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.