Overall score
Macarthur
40.3/100
Richardson
46.4/100
Macarthur vs Richardson, ACT suburb comparison
Macarthur for retirees and families; Richardson for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MacarthurRichardson
Crime rate
Macarthur
8.7 / 1k
Richardson
29.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Macarthur
61
Richardson
58
Population
Macarthur
1,405
Richardson
3,058
Metric leadMacarthur 3Richardson 6across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMacarthur
- Best for familiesMacarthur
- Best for investmentRichardson
- Best for best valueRichardson
- Best for best schoolsRichardson
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Macarthur | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.3/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.7/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.7 / 1k | 29.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 8 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 61 | 58 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 3 |
| Population | 1,405 | 3,058 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Macarthur reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Richardson is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Macarthur pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Richardson is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Macarthur sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Richardson.
Macarthur suits retirees more clearly, whereas Richardson is the stronger match for families and investors.