Overall score
Chisholm
62.1/100
Conder
64.2/100
Chisholm vs Conder, ACT suburb comparison
Chisholm for retirees and investment; Conder for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChisholmConder
Crime rate
Chisholm
21.4 / 1k
Conder
30.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chisholm
126
Conder
110
Population
Chisholm
5,268
Conder
5,108
Metric leadChisholm 4Conder 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Conder is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Chisholm tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Conder stands out for walkability and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Chisholm sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Conder.
Chisholm suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Conder is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.