Chisholm vs Thornton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chisholm for families and schools; Thornton for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChisholmThornton

Overall score

Chisholm

41.5/100

Thornton

48.1/100

Crime rate

Chisholm

77.2 / 1k

Thornton

77.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chisholm

310

Thornton

168

Population

Chisholm

4,577

Thornton

10,690

Metric leadChisholm 2Thornton 74 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChisholmThornton
Overall score41.5/10048.1/100
Housing (desirability)42.8/10057.0/100
Crime rate77.2 / 1k77.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves33
Public transport stops48143
Walkability32.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities310168
Planning activity10652
Green cover8.6%26.2%
Population4,57710,690
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/105/10

Comparison summary

Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Thornton is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Chisholm pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Thornton is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Chisholm the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Thornton.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons