Overall score
Chisholm
41.5/100
Thornton
48.1/100
Chisholm for families and schools; Thornton for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chisholm
41.5/100
Thornton
48.1/100
Crime rate
Chisholm
77.2 / 1k
Thornton
77.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chisholm
310
Thornton
168
Population
Chisholm
4,577
Thornton
10,690
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chisholm | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.5/100 | 48.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 77.2 / 1k | 77.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 143 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 310 | 168 |
| Planning activity | 106 | 52 |
| Green cover | 8.6% | 26.2% |
| Population | 4,577 | 10,690 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Chisholm is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Thornton is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Chisholm pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Thornton is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Chisholm the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Thornton.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.