Overall score
Churchable
35.9/100
Lake Clarendon
25.0/100
Churchable vs Lake Clarendon, QLD Suburb Comparison
Churchable for retirees and families; Lake Clarendon for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChurchableLake Clarendon
Crime rate
Churchable
58.3 / 1k
Lake Clarendon
121.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Churchable
0
Lake Clarendon
3
Population
Churchable
256
Lake Clarendon
294
Metric leadChurchable 2Lake Clarendon 34 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesChurchable
- Best for familiesChurchable
- Best for investmentLake Clarendon
- Best for best valueLake Clarendon
- Best for best schoolsChurchable
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Churchable | Lake Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.9/100 | 25.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.6/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 58.3 / 1k | 121.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 27.4/100 | 27.4/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 256 | 294 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Churchable is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Lake Clarendon is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Churchable pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and overall desirability, whereas Lake Clarendon is the better pick for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
Churchable suits families more clearly, whereas Lake Clarendon is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.