Claremont vs Gosnells suburb comparison (TAS vs WA)

Claremont for investment and value; Gosnells for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaremontGosnells

Overall score

Claremont

53.6/100

Gosnells

55.8/100

Crime rate

Claremont

449.1 / 1k

Gosnells

265.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Claremont

42

Gosnells

449

Population

Claremont

8,397

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadClaremont 2Gosnells 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaremontGosnells
Overall score53.6/10055.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10038.2/100
Crime rate449.1 / 1k265.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Parks & reserves540
Public transport stops71143
Walkability30.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities42449
Population8,39721,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Claremont is a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Claremont tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Gosnells stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Claremont the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.

Related comparisons