Overall score
Gosnells
53.8/100
Maddington
50.6/100
Gosnells for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gosnells
53.8/100
Maddington
50.6/100
Crime rate
Gosnells
553.3 / 1k
Maddington
932.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gosnells
449
Maddington
163
Population
Gosnells
21,149
Maddington
12,419
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gosnells | Maddington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.8/100 | 50.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.2/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 553.3 / 1k | 932.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 40 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 143 | 95 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 449 | 163 |
| Population | 21,149 | 12,419 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Gosnells is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Maddington answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Gosnells, while Maddington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.