Gosnells vs Maddington, WA Suburb Comparison

Gosnells for retirees and families; Maddington for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GosnellsMaddington

Overall score

Gosnells

43.9/100

Maddington

39.8/100

Crime rate

Gosnells

60.1 / 1k

Maddington

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gosnells

791

Maddington

274

Population

Gosnells

21,149

Maddington

12,419

Metric leadGosnells 8Maddington 13 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGosnellsMaddington
Overall score43.9/10039.8/100
Housing (desirability)50.0/10039.0/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves409
Public transport stops14395
Walkability70.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities791274
Green cover10.3%8.2%
Population21,14912,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Gosnells is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Maddington answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gosnells, while Maddington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons