Overall score
Beckenham
59.1/100
Maddington
50.6/100
Beckenham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beckenham
59.1/100
Maddington
50.6/100
Crime rate
Beckenham
1333.8 / 1k
Maddington
932.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beckenham
266
Maddington
163
Population
Beckenham
9,092
Maddington
12,419
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beckenham | Maddington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.1/100 | 50.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 33.5/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 1333.8 / 1k | 932.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 23 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 56 | 95 |
| Walkability | 96.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 266 | 163 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 9,092 | 12,419 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Beckenham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Beckenham is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; Maddington answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Beckenham sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Maddington.
Retirees and investors may find Beckenham the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maddington.