Beckenham vs Maddington, WA suburb comparison

Beckenham for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeckenhamMaddington

Overall score

Beckenham

59.1/100

Maddington

50.6/100

Crime rate

Beckenham

1333.8 / 1k

Maddington

932.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beckenham

266

Maddington

163

Population

Beckenham

9,092

Maddington

12,419

Metric leadBeckenham 5Maddington 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeckenhamMaddington
Overall score59.1/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)33.5/10033.5/100
Crime rate1333.8 / 1k932.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools67
Parks & reserves239
Public transport stops5695
Walkability96.0/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities266163
Planning activity1
Population9,09212,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beckenham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Beckenham is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; Maddington answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Beckenham sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Maddington.

Retirees and investors may find Beckenham the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maddington.

Related comparisons