Langford vs Maddington, WA Suburb Comparison

Langford for families and schools; Maddington for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LangfordMaddington

Overall score

Langford

37.5/100

Maddington

39.8/100

Crime rate

Langford

73.0 / 1k

Maddington

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Langford

103

Maddington

274

Population

Langford

5,505

Maddington

12,419

Metric leadLangford 1Maddington 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLangfordMaddington
Overall score37.5/10039.8/100
Housing (desirability)37.0/10039.0/100
Crime rate73.0 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—9
Public transport stops3295
Walkability36.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities103274
Green cover17.1%8.2%
Population5,50512,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Langford is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Langford tends to lead on excellent public transport, plus rapid growth and new development, while Maddington stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Langford the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Maddington.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons