Beckenham vs Langford, WA Suburb Comparison

Beckenham for retirees and value; Langford for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeckenhamLangford

Overall score

Beckenham

47.9/100

Langford

37.5/100

Crime rate

Beckenham

73.0 / 1k

Langford

73.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beckenham

622

Langford

103

Population

Beckenham

9,092

Langford

5,505

Metric leadBeckenham 8Langford 12 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeckenhamLangford
Overall score47.9/10037.5/100
Housing (desirability)43.0/10037.0/100
Crime rate73.0 / 1k73.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves23—
Public transport stops5632
Walkability100.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities622103
Planning activity1—
Green cover8.7%17.1%
Population9,0925,505
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Beckenham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Langford is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Beckenham pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, whereas Langford is the better pick for excellent public transport, plus rapid growth and new development.

Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Beckenham the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Langford.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons