Beckenham vs Langford, WA suburb comparison

Beckenham for retirees and investment; Langford for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeckenhamLangford

Overall score

Beckenham

59.1/100

Langford

48.3/100

Crime rate

Beckenham

1333.8 / 1k

Langford

2162.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beckenham

266

Langford

73

Population

Beckenham

9,092

Langford

5,505

Metric leadBeckenham 9Langford 0across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeckenhamLangford
Overall score59.1/10048.3/100
Housing (desirability)33.5/10024.4/100
Crime rate1333.8 / 1k2162.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Parks & reserves23
Public transport stops5632
Walkability96.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities26673
Planning activity1
Population9,0925,505
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Beckenham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Langford is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Beckenham pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Langford is the better pick for schools and education options. Beckenham generally means more sought-after housing, while Langford leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and investors may find Beckenham the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Langford.

Related comparisons