Overall score
Beckenham
59.1/100
Langford
48.3/100
Beckenham for retirees and investment; Langford for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beckenham
59.1/100
Langford
48.3/100
Crime rate
Beckenham
1333.8 / 1k
Langford
2162.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beckenham
266
Langford
73
Population
Beckenham
9,092
Langford
5,505
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beckenham | Langford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.1/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 33.5/100 | 24.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 1333.8 / 1k | 2162.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 23 | — |
| Public transport stops | 56 | 32 |
| Walkability | 96.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 266 | 73 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 9,092 | 5,505 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Beckenham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Langford is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Beckenham pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Langford is the better pick for schools and education options. Beckenham generally means more sought-after housing, while Langford leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and investors may find Beckenham the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Langford.