Kenwick vs Langford, WA Suburb Comparison

Kenwick for value; Langford for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KenwickLangford

Overall score

Kenwick

37.9/100

Langford

37.5/100

Crime rate

Kenwick

60.1 / 1k

Langford

73.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kenwick

46

Langford

103

Population

Kenwick

5,684

Langford

5,505

Metric leadKenwick 6Langford 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKenwickLangford
Overall score37.9/10037.5/100
Housing (desirability)43.7/10037.0/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k73.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves1—
Public transport stops3332
Walkability74.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities46103
Green cover7.3%17.1%
Population5,6845,505
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kenwick is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Langford is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Kenwick pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Langford is the better pick for schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Choose Kenwick if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Langford for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons