Huntingdale vs Maddington, WA suburb comparison

Huntingdale for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HuntingdaleMaddington

Overall score

Huntingdale

59.9/100

Maddington

50.6/100

Crime rate

Huntingdale

1223.4 / 1k

Maddington

932.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Huntingdale

213

Maddington

163

Population

Huntingdale

9,021

Maddington

12,419

Metric leadHuntingdale 5Maddington 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHuntingdaleMaddington
Overall score59.9/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10033.5/100
Crime rate1223.4 / 1k932.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Parks & reserves89
Public transport stops4595
Walkability72.0/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities213163
Population9,02112,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Huntingdale is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Huntingdale pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Maddington is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Huntingdale generally means more sought-after housing, while Maddington leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Huntingdale if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Maddington for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons

Huntingdale vs Maddington, WA suburb… | Suburb Guide