Overall score
Huntingdale
59.9/100
Maddington
50.6/100
Huntingdale for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Huntingdale
59.9/100
Maddington
50.6/100
Crime rate
Huntingdale
1223.4 / 1k
Maddington
932.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Huntingdale
213
Maddington
163
Population
Huntingdale
9,021
Maddington
12,419
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Huntingdale | Maddington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.9/100 | 50.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 1223.4 / 1k | 932.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 45 | 95 |
| Walkability | 72.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 213 | 163 |
| Population | 9,021 | 12,419 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Huntingdale is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Huntingdale pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Maddington is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Huntingdale generally means more sought-after housing, while Maddington leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Huntingdale if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Maddington for families and households prioritising schools.