Clarkson vs Quinns Rocks, WA suburb comparison

Quinns Rocks for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClarksonQuinns Rocks

Overall score

Clarkson

58.6/100

Quinns Rocks

61.4/100

Crime rate

Clarkson

741.5 / 1k

Quinns Rocks

916.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clarkson

158

Quinns Rocks

53

Population

Clarkson

13,904

Quinns Rocks

8,861

Metric leadClarkson 6Quinns Rocks 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClarksonQuinns Rocks
Overall score58.6/10061.4/100
Housing (desirability)44.7/10081.4/100
Crime rate741.5 / 1k916.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools711
Parks & reserves3714
Public transport stops6537
Walkability77.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities15853
Population13,9048,861
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Clarkson is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Quinns Rocks is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Quinns Rocks leans into coastal living, while Clarkson feels more inland and suburban in character.

Clarkson tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Quinns Rocks stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability.

Clarkson suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Quinns Rocks is the stronger match for retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Related comparisons