Clarkson vs Ridgewood, WA suburb comparison

Clarkson for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClarksonRidgewood

Overall score

Clarkson

58.6/100

Ridgewood

42.2/100

Crime rate

Clarkson

741.5 / 1k

Ridgewood

2172.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clarkson

158

Ridgewood

26

Population

Clarkson

13,904

Ridgewood

4,623

Metric leadClarkson 7Ridgewood 12 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClarksonRidgewood
Overall score58.6/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)44.7/10044.7/100
Crime rate741.5 / 1k2172.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools78
Parks & reserves378
Public transport stops6516
Walkability77.0/10024.0/100
Nearby amenities15826
Population13,9044,623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/104/10

Comparison summary

Clarkson is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Ridgewood is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Ridgewood sits among greener hillside streets, while Clarkson keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Clarkson pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Ridgewood is the better pick for improving crime trends and good access to parks.

On balance, value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Clarkson, while Ridgewood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons