Clayfield vs Hamilton, QLD suburb comparison

Clayfield for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClayfieldHamilton

Overall score

Clayfield

67.5/100

Hamilton

57.9/100

Crime rate

Clayfield

30.1 / 1k

Hamilton

51.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clayfield

205

Hamilton

278

Population

Clayfield

10,897

Hamilton

8,922

Metric leadClayfield 7Hamilton 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClayfieldHamilton
Overall score67.5/10057.9/100
Housing (desirability)28.4/1005.2/100
Crime rate30.1 / 1k51.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools158
Parks & reserves5
Public transport stops5327
Walkability100.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities205278
Population10,8978,922
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clayfield is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Hamilton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Clayfield pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hamilton is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Clayfield, while Hamilton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons