Clayton vs Springvale, VIC suburb comparison

Clayton for retirees; Springvale for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaytonSpringvale

Overall score

Clayton

67.4/100

Springvale

69.8/100

Crime rate

Clayton

87.6 / 1k

Springvale

131.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clayton

1,210

Springvale

1,200

Population

Clayton

18,988

Springvale

22,174

Metric leadClayton 5Springvale 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaytonSpringvale
Overall score67.4/10069.8/100
Housing (desirability)18.9/10041.8/100
Crime rate87.6 / 1k131.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools410
Parks & reserves1410
Public transport stops111103
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities1,2101,200
Planning activity252238
Population18,98822,174
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Clayton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Springvale is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Springvale sits among greener hillside streets, while Clayton keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Clayton is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Springvale answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Clayton generally means more sought-after housing, while Springvale leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Clayton suits retirees more clearly, whereas Springvale is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons