Overall score
Clayton
67.4/100
Springvale
69.8/100
Clayton for retirees; Springvale for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clayton
67.4/100
Springvale
69.8/100
Crime rate
Clayton
87.6 / 1k
Springvale
131.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clayton
1,210
Springvale
1,200
Population
Clayton
18,988
Springvale
22,174
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clayton | Springvale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.4/100 | 69.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.9/100 | 41.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.6 / 1k | 131.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 10 |
| Public transport stops | 111 | 103 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1,210 | 1,200 |
| Planning activity | 252 | 238 |
| Population | 18,988 | 22,174 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 2/10 |
Clayton is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Springvale is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Springvale sits among greener hillside streets, while Clayton keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Clayton is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Springvale answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Clayton generally means more sought-after housing, while Springvale leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Clayton suits retirees more clearly, whereas Springvale is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.