Overall score
Clayton
67.4/100
Huntingdale
45.8/100
Clayton for families and investment; Huntingdale for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clayton
67.4/100
Huntingdale
45.8/100
Crime rate
Clayton
87.6 / 1k
Huntingdale
85.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clayton
1,210
Huntingdale
87
Population
Clayton
18,988
Huntingdale
1,949
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clayton | Huntingdale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.4/100 | 45.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.9/100 | 29.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.6 / 1k | 85.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | — |
| Public transport stops | 111 | 8 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1,210 | 87 |
| Planning activity | 252 | 30 |
| Population | 18,988 | 1,949 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Clayton reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Huntingdale is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Clayton tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Huntingdale stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.
Clayton suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Huntingdale is the stronger match for retirees.