Overall score
Chadstone
57.6/100
Huntingdale
45.8/100
Chadstone for investment; Huntingdale for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chadstone
57.6/100
Huntingdale
45.8/100
Crime rate
Chadstone
109.8 / 1k
Huntingdale
85.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chadstone
144
Huntingdale
87
Population
Chadstone
9,552
Huntingdale
1,949
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chadstone | Huntingdale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.6/100 | 45.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.4/100 | 29.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 109.8 / 1k | 85.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | — |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 8 |
| Walkability | 98.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 144 | 87 |
| Planning activity | 139 | 30 |
| Population | 9,552 | 1,949 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Chadstone is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Huntingdale is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Chadstone is stronger for public transport access and walkability; Huntingdale answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Chadstone, while Huntingdale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.