Chadstone vs Mount Waverley, VIC Suburb Comparison

Mount Waverley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChadstoneMount Waverley

Overall score

Chadstone

50.5/100

Mount Waverley

62.0/100

Crime rate

Chadstone

110.6 / 1k

Mount Waverley

48.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chadstone

165

Mount Waverley

406

Population

Chadstone

9,552

Mount Waverley

35,340

Metric leadChadstone 3Mount Waverley 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChadstoneMount Waverley
Overall score50.5/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)46.1/10041.9/100
Crime rate110.6 / 1k48.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves432
Public transport stops29138
Walkability98.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities165406
Planning activity139469
Green cover6.9%8.6%
Population9,55235,340
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chadstone is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Chadstone keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Chadstone tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Mount Waverley stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

Investors may find Chadstone the better fit, while retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons