Overall score
Chadstone
57.6/100
Mount Waverley
73.1/100
Chadstone for investment; Mount Waverley for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chadstone
57.6/100
Mount Waverley
73.1/100
Crime rate
Chadstone
109.8 / 1k
Mount Waverley
49.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chadstone
144
Mount Waverley
385
Population
Chadstone
9,552
Mount Waverley
35,340
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chadstone | Mount Waverley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.6/100 | 73.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.4/100 | 26.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 109.8 / 1k | 49.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 32 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 138 |
| Walkability | 98.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 144 | 385 |
| Planning activity | 139 | 469 |
| Population | 9,552 | 35,340 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Chadstone is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Chadstone keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Chadstone tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Mount Waverley stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors may find Chadstone the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley.