Chadstone vs Mount Waverley, VIC suburb comparison

Chadstone for investment; Mount Waverley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChadstoneMount Waverley

Overall score

Chadstone

57.6/100

Mount Waverley

73.1/100

Crime rate

Chadstone

109.8 / 1k

Mount Waverley

49.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chadstone

144

Mount Waverley

385

Population

Chadstone

9,552

Mount Waverley

35,340

Metric leadChadstone 2Mount Waverley 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChadstoneMount Waverley
Overall score57.6/10073.1/100
Housing (desirability)22.4/10026.2/100
Crime rate109.8 / 1k49.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Parks & reserves432
Public transport stops29138
Walkability98.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities144385
Planning activity139469
Population9,55235,340
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chadstone is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Chadstone keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Chadstone tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Mount Waverley stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Investors may find Chadstone the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley.

Related comparisons