Chadstone vs Mount Waverley, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Chadstone | Mount Waverley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 72.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.4/100 | 26.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 120.5 / 1k | 53.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 32 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 140 |
| Walkability | 98.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 144 | 385 |
| Planning activity | 139 | 469 |
| Population | 9,552 | 35,340 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesMount Waverley
- Best for familiesMount Waverley
- Best for investmentChadstone
- Best for best valueMount Waverley
- Best for best schoolsMount Waverley
Comparison summary
Chadstone is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Chadstone keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Chadstone tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Mount Waverley stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Investors may find Chadstone the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley.