Mount Waverley vs Oakleigh East, VIC Suburb Comparison

Mount Waverley for retirees and families; Oakleigh East for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount WaverleyOakleigh East

Overall score

Mount Waverley

62.0/100

Oakleigh East

50.8/100

Crime rate

Mount Waverley

48.4 / 1k

Oakleigh East

45.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Waverley

406

Oakleigh East

107

Population

Mount Waverley

35,340

Oakleigh East

6,804

Metric leadMount Waverley 9Oakleigh East 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount WaverleyOakleigh East
Overall score62.0/10050.8/100
Housing (desirability)41.9/10043.7/100
Crime rate48.4 / 1k45.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools97
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves328
Public transport stops13829
Walkability94.0/10040.0/100
Nearby amenities406107
Planning activity46985
Green cover8.6%5.4%
Population35,3406,804
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Oakleigh East is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Oakleigh East keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Waverley tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Oakleigh East stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Mount Waverley suits retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Oakleigh East is the stronger match for investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons