Mount Waverley vs Notting Hill, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Mount Waverley | Notting Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.9/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.2/100 | 31.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.5 / 1k | 105.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 32 | — |
| Public transport stops | 140 | 17 |
| Walkability | 94.0/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 385 | 131 |
| Planning activity | 469 | 35 |
| Population | 35,340 | 2,895 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesMount Waverley
- Best for familiesMount Waverley
- Best for investmentMount Waverley
- Best for best valueMount Waverley
- Best for best schoolsMount Waverley
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Mount Waverley is a hills larger suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Notting Hill is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mount Waverley sits among greener hillside streets, while Notting Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Waverley tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Notting Hill stands out for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Waverley, while Notting Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.